The project is more of a management strategy than a design per se, which leaves open the possibility of multiple interpretations; this proposal represents just one possible configuration. At a macro scale, it allows for a number of possible functions, ranging from public to private and intermediate. For the most part the strategy focuses on the conversion of part of one of these private areas into intermediate areas, with services that would attract the public (sport, fitness, culture, markets on the right bank, etc.), thus making the project economically viable for the owners. The vegetable gardens and private portions are retained, becoming a sort of 'farm-park' that will also be on view to visitors. It is precisely these private and semi-public areas that will guarantee a sense of security and help to avoid the degradation that typically occurs when public places are abandoned.
The area dedicated to the public is represented by open spaces planted with vegetation. The entire area benefits from its two borders, the highway and the park. The relationship with the highway is softened by a barrier of vegetation, which helps to resolve the issue of proximity to the road, guaranteeing sound control and environmental qualification. Perpendicular ‘strips’ follow the same logic of ‘closure’ used along the highway, improving sound control and offering space for small buildings that would fulfil various functions. The river side is left open; the desire is to re-establish full usability of the river by restoring the banks, over which a continuous path would be superimposed. The poles of the site are more architectonically developed and host different public functions.